[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lgo1cslu.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 14:45:01 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...nulli.us, ivecera@...hat.com,
andrew@...n.ch, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 04/12] net: dsa: Add ordered workqueue
Hi Arkadi,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> writes:
> On 07/05/2017 08:36 AM, Arkadi Sharshevsky wrote:
>> This workqueue will be used for FDB add/del processing. It should
>> be destroyed after all devices unregistered successfully.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/dsa.h | 1 +
>> net/dsa/dsa.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
>> index f054d41..4835b0e 100644
>> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
>> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
>> @@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ void unregister_switch_driver(struct dsa_switch_driver *type);
>> struct mii_bus *dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(struct device *dev);
>>
>> struct net_device *dsa_dev_to_net_device(struct device *dev);
>> +bool dsa_schedule_work(struct work_struct *work);
>
> I'd move this to dsa_priv.h in net/dsa/ because it is not supposed to be
> used by DSA drivers.
>
> You may also consider squashing this into the next patch since in itself
> it's not used just yet.
I agree with Florian on this. Even though it'll make the next patch a
bit bigger, it'll make it easier to understand the whole workqueue
processing logic.
Thanks,
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists