[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR12MB1600BB2E71001D9C3E0448DBC8D50@MWHPR12MB1600.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 22:37:14 +0000
From: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
To: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
CC: Dustin Byford <dustin@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linville@...driver.com" <linville@...driver.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"vidya.chowdary@...il.com" <vidya.chowdary@...il.com>,
"olson@...ulusnetworks.com" <olson@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Manoj Malviya <manojmalviya@...lsio.com>,
Santosh Rastapur <santosh@...lsio.com>,
"yuval.mintz@...gic.com" <yuval.mintz@...gic.com>,
"odedw@...lanox.com" <odedw@...lanox.com>,
"ariela@...lanox.com" <ariela@...lanox.com>,
"galp@...lanox.com" <galp@...lanox.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: ethtool: add support for forward error
correction modes
| From: Wyborny, Carolyn <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
| Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:16 PM
|
| Agree with your points generally, but other networking hw vendors have
| dealt with this since SFP variant and other modules arrived on the scene.
The only case of this of which I'm aware is the SFP+ RJ45 1Gb/s
Transceiver Module. But yes, that presaged what we're looking at
now as a much simpler example.
Casey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists