[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1499333003.16045.15.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 02:23:23 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Lin Zhang <xiaolou4617@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] skbuff: optimize the pull_pages code in
__pskb_pull_tail()
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 02:16 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 17:01 +0800, Lin Zhang wrote:
> > In the pull_pages code block, if the first frags size > eat,
> > we can end the loop in advance to avoid extra copy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lin Zhang <xiaolou4617@...il.com>
> > ---
> > net/core/skbuff.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index f990eb8..c00a1df 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -1720,6 +1720,10 @@ void *__pskb_pull_tail(struct sk_buff *skb, int delta)
> > skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[k].page_offset += eat;
> > skb_frag_size_sub(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[k], eat);
> > eat = 0;
> > + if (!i) {
> > + k = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > }
> > k++;
> > }
>
> 1) net-next is closed during merge window.
>
> 2) This change is completely buggy.
> How have you tested it exactly ???
Hmm... it looks like I was wrong, but 1) still applies ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists