netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: chelsio: cxgb3: constify attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8884bd80-b8d5-1c1e-5235-b0a0c173bc45@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:11:06 +0530
From:   Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, santosh@...lsio.com,
        davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: chelsio: cxgb3: constify attribute_group structures.

Hi Joe,


On Monday 10 July 2017 10:30 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 16:04 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
>> working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work
>> with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
> I think it's good you are doing all of these.
>
> Instead of individually sending these patches, could you
> please send a patch series for all of these attribute_group
> patches with a cover letter at the same time?
>
> That could make it easier for a trivial maintainer to apply
> all of these at once and not get some applied and others
> ignored or dropped on the floor.
>
Once again, I will send all of patch together, But I have doubt. If it's 
having
different maintainer. Example- 'net:' subsystem is having a different 
different
maintainer. So do i need to add all the maintainer in single list. Which 
can confuse
what patch is for what maintainer. Please suggest me.

Thanks ,
~arvind