[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170711.173651.744697529471539908.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc: amritha.nambiar@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, kiran.patil@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, mitch.a.williams@...el.com,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, neerav.parikh@...el.com,
sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, carolyn.wyborny@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Configuring traffic classes via new hardware
offload mechanism in tc/mqprio
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:18:17 -0700
> On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 07:26 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>
>> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 03:18:30 -0700
>>
>> > The following series introduces a new hardware offload mode in
>> > tc/mqprio where the TCs, the queue configurations and
>> > bandwidth rate limits are offloaded to the hardware.
>>
>> net-next is closed, please resubmit this when net-next opens
>> again:
>>
>> http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/net-next.html
>>
>> Thank you.
>
> Dave, this is gonna come through my tree. Amritha is looking for
> community feedback, while we have this under validation. Sorry for the
> confusion.
One way to deal with this is to say something like:
[PATCH net-next RFC]
in the subject lines instead of just:
[PATCH net-next]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists