[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170712064911.GA2769@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:49:12 +0200
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: make const array glrt_table static
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:47:33PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Don't populate array glrt_table on the stack but make it static.
> Makes the object code a smaller by over 670 bytes:
>
> Before:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 131772 4733 0 136505 21539 rt2800lib.o
>
> After:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 131043 4789 0 135832 21298 rt2800lib.o
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
I wonder why compiler do not optimize by itself since array is
const, but patch is ok.
Stanislaw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists