[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170717.141048.999243831453421230.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: andrew@...n.ch
Cc: vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/12] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add Energy Detect
ops
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:04:05 +0200
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 01:45:49PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
>> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:32:52 -0400
>>
>> > Hi Andrew,
>> >
>> > Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
>> >
>> >> I never liked this. I think it is architecturally wrong for the switch
>> >> to be poking around in the PHY. It should ask the PHY driver. This is
>> >> especially true for external PHYs which might not be a Marvell PHY.
>> >
>> > I share the same concern. However this patch is just isolating the
>> > existing code so that we get rid of the last caps and flags and stop
>> > writing (without reading them first) arbitrary registers.
>> >
>> > Once this portion is moved to the PHY driver, one can remove it from
>> > mv88e6xxx.
>>
>> Seems a reasonable plan of action.
>>
>> Andrew, do you agree?
>
> Hi David
>
> I just fear it will not get fixed, just put into a corner to
> fester. Having to fix it properly before these patches are merged
> provides some incentive.
If Vivien doesn't make good on his promises to do so, tell me and
I will revert all of these changes.
Ok?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists