lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170717133811.GA30392@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:38:11 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     sean.wang@...iatek.com
Cc:     john@...ozen.org, davem@...emloft.net, nbd@...nwrt.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] dt-bindings: net: mediatek: add support
 for MediaTek MT7623 and MT7622 SoC

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:06:22PM +0800, sean.wang@...iatek.com wrote:
> From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> 
> The patch adds the supplements in the dt-binding document for MediaTek
> MT7622 SoC with extra SGMII system controller and relevant clock consumers
> listed as the requirements for those SoCs equipped with the SGMII circuit.
> Also, add the missing binding information for MT7623 SoC here which relies
> on the fallback binding of MT2701.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt
> index c7194e8..1d1168b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt
> @@ -7,24 +7,30 @@ have dual GMAC each represented by a child node..
>  * Ethernet controller node
>  
>  Required properties:
> -- compatible: Should be "mediatek,mt2701-eth"
> +- compatible: Should be
> +		"mediatek,mt2701-eth": for MT2701 SoC
> +		"mediatek,mt7623-eth", "mediatek,mt2701-eth": for MT7623 SoC

Hi Sean

We appear to have "mediatek,mt2701-eth" twice.

   Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ