[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877ez5boxj.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:06:00 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...nulli.us, ivecera@...hat.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: dsa: Move FDB dump implementation inside DSA
Hi Arkadi,
Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com> writes:
> +typedef int dsa_fdb_dump_cb_t(const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
> + u16 ndm_state, void *data);
Can I ask you to change u16 ndm_state for bool is_static at the same
time? Ethernet switches do not need to report more than that.
> +static int
> +dsa_slave_port_fdb_do_dump(const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
> + u16 ndm_state, void *data)
> +{
> + struct dsa_slave_dump_ctx *dump = data;
> + u32 portid = NETLINK_CB(dump->cb->skb).portid;
> + u32 seq = dump->cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
> + struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
> + struct ndmsg *ndm;
> +
> + if (dump->idx < dump->cb->args[2])
> + goto skip;
> +
> + nlh = nlmsg_put(dump->skb, portid, seq, RTM_NEWNEIGH,
> + sizeof(*ndm), NLM_F_MULTI);
> + if (!nlh)
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> + ndm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
> + ndm->ndm_family = AF_BRIDGE;
> + ndm->ndm_pad1 = 0;
> + ndm->ndm_pad2 = 0;
> + ndm->ndm_flags = NTF_SELF;
> + ndm->ndm_type = 0;
> + ndm->ndm_ifindex = dump->dev->ifindex;
> + ndm->ndm_state = ndm_state;
So we can simply scope this here:
ndm->ndm_state = is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
> +
> + if (nla_put(dump->skb, NDA_LLADDR, ETH_ALEN, addr))
> + goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> + if (vid && nla_put_u16(dump->skb, NDA_VLAN, vid))
> + goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> + nlmsg_end(dump->skb, nlh);
> +
> +skip:
> + dump->idx++;
> + return 0;
> +
> +nla_put_failure:
> + nlmsg_cancel(dump->skb, nlh);
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +}
Other than that, LGTM.
Thanks,
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists