[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871spdboov.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:11:12 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...nulli.us, ivecera@...hat.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/11] net: switchdev: Remove bridge bypass support from switchdev
Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com> writes:
> Currently the bridge port flags, vlans, FDBs and MDBs can be offloaded
> through the bridge code, making the switchdev's SELF bridge bypass
> implementation to be redundant. This implies several changes:
> - No need for dump infra in switchdev, DSA's special case is handled
> privately.
> - Remove obj_dump from switchdev_ops.
> - FDBs are removed from obj_add/del routines, due to the fact that they
> are offloaded through the bridge notifcation chain.
notification*
> - The switchdev_port_bridge_xx() and switchdev_port_fdb_xx() functions
> can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists