netdev - Re: [patch net-next 10/17] ipv6: fib: Add offload indication to routes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21bdef55-9cd2-8a17-9eaa-a10cfc6ef4d4@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:27:30 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
        kafai@...com, hannes@...essinduktion.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        edumazet@...gle.com, yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 10/17] ipv6: fib: Add offload indication to
 routes

On 7/19/17 1:02 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Allow user space applications to see which routes are offloaded and
> which aren't by setting the RTNH_F_OFFLOAD flag when dumping them.
> 
> To be consistent with IPv4, a multipath route is marked as offloaded if
> one of its nexthops is offloaded. Individual nexthops aren't marked with
> the 'offload' flag.

It is more user friendly to report the offload per nexthop especially
given the implications. There are already flags per nexthop and those
flags are pushed to userspace so not an API change at all.