netdev - [PATCH net 3/5] bpf: fix up test cases with mixed signed/unsigned bounds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <f52713443d326b828e0352844df07c1c2561e1f9.1500586732.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:23 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     ast@...com, ecree@...arflare.com, josef@...icpanda.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH net 3/5] bpf: fix up test cases with mixed signed/unsigned bounds

Fix the few existing test cases that used mixed signed/unsigned
bounds and switch them only to one flavor. Reason why we need this
is that proper boundaries cannot be derived from mixed tests.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index f4d0a1d..64b39d3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -4969,7 +4969,7 @@ struct test_val {
 			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2,
 				sizeof(struct test_val), 4),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
-			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
 			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -4995,7 +4995,7 @@ struct test_val {
 			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2,
 				sizeof(struct test_val) + 1, 4),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
-			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
 			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -5023,7 +5023,7 @@ struct test_val {
 			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2,
 				sizeof(struct test_val) - 20, 4),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
-			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
 			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -5050,7 +5050,7 @@ struct test_val {
 			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2,
 				sizeof(struct test_val) - 19, 4),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
-			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
 			BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-- 
1.9.3