netdev - [PATCH net 4/5] bpf: add test for mixed signed and unsigned bounds checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <083043c3cb489973a1906c8bda2b4e8906ad22ec.1500586732.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:24 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     ast@...com, ecree@...arflare.com, josef@...icpanda.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 4/5] bpf: add test for mixed signed and unsigned bounds checks

From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>

These failed due to a bug in verifier bounds handling.

Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 64b39d3..48b7997 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -5510,6 +5510,58 @@ struct test_val {
 		.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
 		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
 	},
+	{
+		"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, positive bounds",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+				     BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7),
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 2),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 3),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 4, 2),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
+		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
+		.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+	},
+	{
+		"bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+			BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+				     BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7),
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 3),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
+		.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
+		.errstr = "R0 min value is negative",
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+	},
 };
 
 static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
-- 
1.9.3