netdev - RE: [PATCH V3 net-next 1/8] net: hns3: Add support of HNS3 Ethernet Driver for hip08 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F4CC6FACFEB3C54C9141D49AD221F7F93B81CBD6@FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 22 Jul 2017 23:17:13 +0000
From:   Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
        huangdaode <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>,
        "lipeng (Y)" <lipeng321@...wei.com>,
        "mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com" <mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 net-next 1/8] net: hns3: Add support of HNS3 Ethernet
 Driver for hip08 SoC

Hi Andrew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:andrew@...n.ch]
> Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 6:54 PM
> To: Salil Mehta
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen); huangdaode; lipeng (Y);
> mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linuxarm
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 1/8] net: hns3: Add support of HNS3
> Ethernet Driver for hip08 SoC
> 
> > +static int hns3_nic_net_up(struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > +	struct hns3_nic_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +	struct hnae3_handle *h = priv->ae_handle;
> > +	int i, j;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = hns3_nic_init_irq(priv);
> > +	if (ret != 0) {
> 
>   	if (ret)
> 
> No need to compare with zero.
Sure, changed in V4 patch. 

Thanks
Salil
> 
> > +		netdev_err(ndev, "hns init irq failed! ret=%d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> 
> > +static int hns3_nic_net_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > +	struct hns3_nic_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +	struct hnae3_handle *h = priv->ae_handle;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	netif_carrier_off(ndev);
> > +
> > +	ret = netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, h->kinfo.num_tqps);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		netdev_err(ndev, "netif_set_real_num_tx_queues fail,
> ret=%d!\n",
> > +			   ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> 
> In general, functions return 0 for success, and something else for an
> error. So there is no need to do a comparison. Please remove all
> comparisons, unless it is really needed. It also makes the code look
> consistent. At the moment you sometime have < 0, sometime !=0, and
> sometimes no comparison at all.
Acknowledged, scanned and have changed in V4 patch. Please have a look.

Thanks
Salil
> 
> 	  Andrew