[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64377a01-38df-6d43-16a4-401d426fb9b2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:49:53 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: no need to return rt->dst.error if it is not
null entry.
On 7/26/17 12:27 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> agreed...so looks like the check in v3 should be
>
>
> + if ( rt == net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry ||
> + (rt->dst.error &&
> + #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES
> + rt != net->ipv6.ip6_prohibit_entry &&
> + rt != net->ipv6.ip6_blk_hole_entry &&
> +#endif
> + )) {
> err = rt->dst.error;
> ip6_rt_put(rt);
> goto errout;
>
I don't think so. If I add a prohibit route and use the fibmatch
attribute, I want to see the route from the FIB that was matched.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists