[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170726.130747.9593997952509805.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: andrew@...n.ch
Cc: vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, privat@...l-hjelmeland.no,
corbet@....net, f.fainelli@...il.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net: dsa: lan9303: Fixed MDIO
interface
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:52:24 +0200
>> > So I really want to group the patches into only a few series in order
>> > to not spend months on the process.
>
> I strongly agree with Vivien here. Good patches get accepted in about
> 3 days. You should expect feedback within a day or two. That allows
> you to have fast cycle times for getting patches in.
+1
Small simple patches will get everything in 10 times fast than if
you clump everything together into larger, harder to review ones.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists