[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJieiUiXuN9s0ndJ4K6UVE2pomRi0aD9PH6uYHe12qCzL0+wSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:53:01 -0700
From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Vidya Sagar Ravipati <vidya.chowdary@...il.com>,
Dustin Byford <dustin@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Dave Olson <olson@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>,
Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Manoj Malviya <manojmalviya@...lsio.com>,
Santosh Rastapur <santosh@...lsio.com>, yuval.mintz@...gic.com,
odedw@...lanox.com, Ariel Almog <ariela@...lanox.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] ethtool: support for forward error
correction mode setting on a link
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:47:25 -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> Forward Error Correction (FEC) modes i.e Base-R
>> and Reed-Solomon modes are introduced in 25G/40G/100G standards
>> for providing good BER at high speeds. Various networking devices
>> which support 25G/40G/100G provides ability to manage supported FEC
>> modes and the lack of FEC encoding control and reporting today is a
>> source for interoperability issues for many vendors.
>> FEC capability as well as specific FEC mode i.e. Base-R
>> or RS modes can be requested or advertised through bits D44:47 of base link
>> codeword.
>>
>> This patch set intends to provide option under ethtool to manage and
>> report FEC encoding settings for networking devices as per IEEE 802.3
>> bj, bm and by specs.
>>
>> v2 :
>> - minor patch format fixes and typos pointed out by Andrew
>> - there was a pending discussion on the use of 'auto' vs
>> 'automatic' for fec settings. I have left it as 'auto'
>> because in most cases today auto is used in place of
>> automatic to represent automatically generated values.
>> We use it in other networking config too. I would prefer
>> leaving it as auto.
>
> On the subject of resetting the values when module is replugged I
> assume what was previously described remains:
> - we always allow users to set the FEC regardless of the module type;
> - if user set an incorrect FEC for the module type (or module gets
> swapped) the link will be administratively taken down by either
> the driver or FW.
>
> Is that correct? Am I misremembering?
yes, correct. And possible future sfp hotplug events can give user-space
more info to react to module type changes etc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists