netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Add internal phy support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <69ad9443-ff65-8e49-df68-7e5e6c812d45@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:56:03 +0800
From:   "David.Wu" <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, heiko@...ech.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
        olof@...om.net, linux@...linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de,
        peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
        huangtao@...k-chips.com, hwg@...k-chips.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Add internal phy support

Hi Florian,

在 2017/7/28 0:54, Florian Fainelli 写道:
> - if you need knowledge about this PHY connection type prior to binding
> the PHY device and its driver (that is, before of_phy_connect()) we
> could add a boolean property e.g: "phy-is-internal" that allows us to
> know that, or we can have a new phy-mode value, e.g: "internal-rmii"
> which describes that, either way would probably be fine, but the former
> scales better
> 

Using "phy-is-internal" is very helpful, but it is easy to confuse with 
the real internal PHY, may we use the other words like phy is inlined🙂.

> Then again, using phy-mode = "internal" even though this is Reduced MII
> is not big of a deal IMHO as long as there is no loss of information and
> that internal de-facto means internal reduced MII for instance.
> --