netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v1] net: ethernet: nb8800: Reset HW block in ndo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:02:00 +0200
From:   Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
To:     Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
Cc:     Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] net: ethernet: nb8800: Reset HW block in ndo_open

On 29/07/2017 13:24, Måns Rullgård wrote:

> Until you figure out why it's getting stuck, we can't be sure
> it isn't caused by something that could trigger at any time.
Would you take a look at it, if I can reproduce on tango4?

I have identified a 100% reproducible flaw.
I have proposed a work-around that brings this down to 0
(tested 1000 cycles of link up / ping / link down).

In my opinion, upstream should consider this work-around
for inclusion. I'd like to hear David's and Florian's
opinion on the topic. It's always a pain to maintain
out-of-tree patches.

> Yes, but by then you've reset those parameters to the defaults.

Good catch. There is some non HW-related init in
nb8800_hw_init().

I'll take this opportunity to change flow control to
off by default (it breaks several 100 Mbps switches).
I'll take a closer look at priv assignments on Monday.

Regards.