[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170730190534.GC1872@nanopsycho>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 21:05:34 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
horms@...ge.net.au, dsahern@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 3/4] net sched actions: dump more than
TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch
Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 07:24:51PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>
>When you dump hundreds of thousands of actions, getting only 32 per
>dump batch even when the socket buffer and memory allocations allow
>is inefficient.
>
>With this change, the user will get as many as possibly fitting
>within the given constraints available to the kernel.
>
>The top level action TLV space is extended. An attribute
>TCA_ROOT_FLAGS is used to carry flags; flag TCA_FLAG_LARGE_DUMP_ON
>is set by the user indicating the user is capable of processing
>these large dumps. Older user space which doesnt set this flag
>doesnt get the large (than 32) batches.
>The kernel uses the TCA_ROOT_COUNT attribute to tell the user how many
>actions are put in a single batch. As such user space app knows how long
>to iterate (independent of the type of action being dumped)
>instead of hardcoded maximum of 32 thus maintaining backward compat.
>
>Some results dumping 1.5M actions below:
>first an unpatched tc which doesnt understand these features...
>
>prompt$ time -p tc actions ls action gact | grep index | wc -l
>1500000
>real 1388.43
>user 2.07
>sys 1386.79
>
>Now lets see a patched tc which sets the correct flags when requesting
>a dump:
>
>prompt$ time -p updatedtc actions ls action gact | grep index | wc -l
>1500000
>real 178.13
>user 2.02
>sys 176.96
>
>That is about 8x performance improvement for tc app which sets its
>receive buffer to about 32K.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
If DavidA is ok with the "validation_data", I am fine with this patch.
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists