[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <737970c5-5a5a-025a-2c1c-205971b6898e@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:40:19 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: no need to return rt->dst.error if it is not
null entry.
On 7/31/17 12:37 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>
>> So Roopa's fibmatch patches brings consistency between IPv4 and IPv6 at
>> the cost of breaking backwards compatibility for IPv6 when the prohibit
>> or blackhole routes are hit.
>>
> There are already many differences between IPv4 and
> IPv6 behaviors, I don't see why this one is so special
> that we have to make it consistent.
yes, and I have sent a number of patches closing the gap.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists