[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170731063833.GB1883@nanopsycho>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:38:33 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
horms@...ge.net.au, dsahern@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 1/4] net netlink: Add new type NLA_BITFIELD32
Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:59:10PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>Jiri,
>
>This is getting exhausting, seriously.
>I posted the code you are commenting one two days ago so i dont have to
>repost.
And I commented on the "*u32 = *u32" thing. But you ignored it. Pardon
me for mentioning that again now :/
>
>On D. Ahern: I dont think we are disagreeing anymore on the need to
>generalize the check. He is saying it should be a helper and I already
>had the validation data; either works. I dont see the gapping need
>to remove the validation data.
DavidA? Your opinion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists