netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Refactor lan9303_xxx_packet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7885564f-2e67-c034-20e6-0377101ff4a7@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:32:15 +0200
From:   Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Refactor lan9303_xxx_packet_processing

On 31. juli 2017 15:22, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
>> First patch:
>> Change lan9303_enable_packet_processing,
>> lan9303_disable_packet_processing():
>> Pass port number (0,1,2) as parameter instead of port offset.
>> Plus replaced a constant 0x400 with LAN9303_SWITCH_PORT_REG()
> 
> Hi Egil
> 
> The cover note and the commit message should concentrate on the Why,
> not the What. I can see the What by reading the patch.
> 
> Why do you want to pass port numbers?
> 
Because other functions in the module pass port numbers. And to enable
the simplifications.

> Note that for netdev, the cover note also ends up in git as part of
> the history.
> 

OK, I did not know that netdev does that.

>     Andrew
>