[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD004745C@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:39:07 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Natale Patriciello' <natale.patriciello@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ahmed Said <ahmed.said@...roma2.it>,
Francesco Zampognaro <zampognaro@....uniroma2.it>,
Cesare Roseti <roseti@....uniroma2.it>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v1 5/5] wave: Added basic version of TCP Wave
From: Natale Patriciello
> Sent: 28 July 2017 20:59
..
> +static __always_inline bool test_flag(u8 value, const u8 *flags)
> +{
> + return (*flags & value) == value;
> +}
...
> + if (!test_flag(FLAG_INIT, &ca->flags))
> + return;
...
That is a completely unnecessary 'helper'.
It has its arguments in the wrong order.
Doesn't need to pass by reference.
Since you only ever check one bit you don't need the '=='.
Any error seems to be silently ignored.
I bet they can't actually happen at all.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists