[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c65cfbc7-8ead-bad4-7d75-f2dd7361bebf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 20:27:25 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
horms@...ge.net.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 1/4] net netlink: Add new type NLA_BITFIELD32
On 7/30/17 1:59 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On D. Ahern: I dont think we are disagreeing anymore on the need to
> generalize the check. He is saying it should be a helper and I already
> had the validation data; either works. I dont see the gapping need
> to remove the validation data.
I never disagreed on general code; I have always disagreed on validating
values as part of the policy check.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists