netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: lan9303: Simplify lan9303_xxx_packet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:08:12 +0200
From:   Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
To:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: lan9303: Simplify
 lan9303_xxx_packet_processing() usage

On 31. juli 2017 17:01, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Egil,
> 
> Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no> writes:
> 
>> Would doing
>>
>> -	chip->ds = dsa_switch_alloc(chip->dev, DSA_MAX_PORTS);
>> +	chip->ds = dsa_switch_alloc(chip->dev, LAN9303_NUM_PORTS);
>>
>> at the same time be good, or breaking the scope of the patch?
> 
> It is indeed out of scope. You may want to add a first commit "net: dsa:
> lan9303: introduce LAN9303_NUM_PORTS" for instance.
> 

In a later series I assume? Or is allowed to add patches to a series
under review?


> 
> Thanks,
> 
>          Vivien
> 

Egil