[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170801203241.22294-8-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:32:37 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: call phy_init_eee
It is safer to init the EEE before the DSA layer call
phy_ethtool_set_eee, as sf2 and qca8k are doing.
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 647d5d45c1d6..b531d4a3bab5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -855,6 +855,12 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_set_eee(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = ds->priv;
int err;
+ if (e->eee_enabled) {
+ err = phy_init_eee(phydev, 0);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
err = mv88e6xxx_energy_detect_write(chip, port, e);
mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
--
2.13.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists