netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ppp: Fix a scheduling-while-atomic bug in del

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVEsTpg17RZ1Y1jN2e0wb_X6gtxx05rmUSGa=A=XSj=Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2017 13:39:21 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Gao Feng <gfree.wind@....163.com>
Cc:     xeb@...l.ru, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ppp: Fix a scheduling-while-atomic bug in del_chan

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:07 AM,  <gfree.wind@....163.com> wrote:
> From: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@....163.com>
>
> The PPTP set the pptp_sock_destruct as the sock's sk_destruct, it would
> trigger this bug when __sk_free is invoked in atomic context, because of
> the call path pptp_sock_destruct->del_chan->synchronize_rcu.
>
> Now move the synchronize_rcu to pptp_release from del_chan. This is the
> only one case which would free the sock and need the synchronize_rcu.

I don't understand the last part.

>From my understanding, this RCU is supposed to protect the pppox_sock
pointers in 'callid_sock' which could be NULL'ed in del_chan(). And the
pppox_sock is freed when the last refcnt is gone, that is, when sock
dctor is called. pptp_release() is ONLY called when the fd in user-space
is gone, not necessarily the last refcnt.