[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77de100a-42b1-1e0d-6545-cadb0067eec6@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 09:21:42 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [for 4.13] net: qcom/emac: disable flow control
autonegotiation by default
On 8/2/17 8:48 AM, David Laight wrote:
> If the nearby switches cannot handle pause frames, then the MAC shouldn't
> be sending them at all.
There's no way for me to know whether the switches can handle the pause
frames or not. You would think that sending one multicast pause frame
ever 33ms would not overload a switch, but in our lab it does.
This is why I changed the default to disable sending pause frames.
> They
>
> I suspect that they should only ever be sent if the phy autonegotiation
> indicates that they are supported.
Or if you manually enable them. That's why I changed to default: the
MAC is now configured by default to accept pause frames but not send them.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists