[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170802194231.26a45521@xeon-e3>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 19:42:31 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 12:01:37 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 4a0dee1ffe0e ("netvsc: Initialize 64-bit stats seqcount")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
> 35fbbccfb417 ("netvsc: save pointer to parent netvsc_device in channel table")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Thanks, that looks right.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists