[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170803131954.15441-3-ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:19:53 -0400
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net 2/3] tcp: enable xmit timer fix by having TLP use time when RTO should fire
Have tcp_schedule_loss_probe() base the TLP scheduling decision based
on when the RTO *should* fire. This is to enable the upcoming xmit
timer fix in this series, where tcp_schedule_loss_probe() cannot
assume that the last timer installed was an RTO timer (because we are
no longer doing the "rearm RTO, rearm RTO, rearm TLP" dance on every
ACK). So tcp_schedule_loss_probe() must independently figure out when
an RTO would want to fire.
In the new TLP implementation following in this series, we cannot
assume that icsk_timeout was set based on an RTO; after processing a
cumulative ACK the icsk_timeout we see can be from a previous TLP or
RTO. So we need to independently recalculate the RTO time (instead of
reading it out of icsk_timeout). Removing this dependency on the
nature of icsk_timeout makes things a little easier to reason about
anyway.
Note that the old and new code should be equivalent, since they are
both saying: "if the RTO is in the future, but at an earlier time than
the normal TLP time, then set the TLP timer to fire when the RTO would
have fired".
Fixes: 6ba8a3b19e76 ("tcp: Tail loss probe (TLP)")
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 14 +++++---------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 2f1588bf73da..cd8e257492c4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -2377,8 +2377,8 @@ bool tcp_schedule_loss_probe(struct sock *sk)
{
struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
- u32 timeout, tlp_time_stamp, rto_time_stamp;
u32 rtt = usecs_to_jiffies(tp->srtt_us >> 3);
+ u32 timeout, rto_delta_us;
/* No consecutive loss probes. */
if (WARN_ON(icsk->icsk_pending == ICSK_TIME_LOSS_PROBE)) {
@@ -2417,14 +2417,10 @@ bool tcp_schedule_loss_probe(struct sock *sk)
(rtt + (rtt >> 1) + TCP_DELACK_MAX));
timeout = max_t(u32, timeout, msecs_to_jiffies(10));
- /* If RTO is shorter, just schedule TLP in its place. */
- tlp_time_stamp = tcp_jiffies32 + timeout;
- rto_time_stamp = (u32)inet_csk(sk)->icsk_timeout;
- if ((s32)(tlp_time_stamp - rto_time_stamp) > 0) {
- s32 delta = rto_time_stamp - tcp_jiffies32;
- if (delta > 0)
- timeout = delta;
- }
+ /* If the RTO formula yields an earlier time, then use that time. */
+ rto_delta_us = tcp_rto_delta_us(sk); /* How far in future is RTO? */
+ if (rto_delta_us > 0)
+ timeout = min_t(u32, timeout, usecs_to_jiffies(rto_delta_us));
inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer(sk, ICSK_TIME_LOSS_PROBE, timeout,
TCP_RTO_MAX);
--
2.14.0.rc1.383.gd1ce394fe2-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists