netdev - [PATCH v4 net-next 04/13] bpf/verifier: more concise register state logs for constant var

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <695e6ddf-067a-b347-d9ef-283582ae6955@solarflare.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2017 17:12:38 +0100
From:   Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        iovisor-dev <iovisor-dev@...ts.iovisor.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 04/13] bpf/verifier: more concise register state
 logs for constant var_off

Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ca14f59..2924b01 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -234,25 +234,33 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state)
 				verbose(",ks=%d,vs=%d",
 					reg->map_ptr->key_size,
 					reg->map_ptr->value_size);
-			if (reg->smin_value != reg->umin_value &&
-			    reg->smin_value != S64_MIN)
-				verbose(",smin_value=%lld",
-					(long long)reg->smin_value);
-			if (reg->smax_value != reg->umax_value &&
-			    reg->smax_value != S64_MAX)
-				verbose(",smax_value=%lld",
-					(long long)reg->smax_value);
-			if (reg->umin_value != 0)
-				verbose(",umin_value=%llu",
-					(unsigned long long)reg->umin_value);
-			if (reg->umax_value != U64_MAX)
-				verbose(",umax_value=%llu",
-					(unsigned long long)reg->umax_value);
-			if (!tnum_is_unknown(reg->var_off)) {
-				char tn_buf[48];
-
-				tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
-				verbose(",var_off=%s", tn_buf);
+			if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
+				/* Typically an immediate SCALAR_VALUE, but
+				 * could be a pointer whose offset is too big
+				 * for reg->off
+				 */
+				verbose(",imm=%llx", reg->var_off.value);
+			} else {
+				if (reg->smin_value != reg->umin_value &&
+				    reg->smin_value != S64_MIN)
+					verbose(",smin_value=%lld",
+						(long long)reg->smin_value);
+				if (reg->smax_value != reg->umax_value &&
+				    reg->smax_value != S64_MAX)
+					verbose(",smax_value=%lld",
+						(long long)reg->smax_value);
+				if (reg->umin_value != 0)
+					verbose(",umin_value=%llu",
+						(unsigned long long)reg->umin_value);
+				if (reg->umax_value != U64_MAX)
+					verbose(",umax_value=%llu",
+						(unsigned long long)reg->umax_value);
+				if (!tnum_is_unknown(reg->var_off)) {
+					char tn_buf[48];
+
+					tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
+					verbose(",var_off=%s", tn_buf);
+				}
 			}
 			verbose(")");
 		}