[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170804090910.72a1a4ad@xeon-e3>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:09:10 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iproute2/misc: do not mix CFLAGS with LDFLAGS
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 11:54:02 +0200
Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de> wrote:
> during linking, do not use CFLAGS. This avoid clashes when doing PIE builds.
> ---
> misc/Makefile | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/misc/Makefile b/misc/Makefile
> index 72807678..1d86c44d 100644
> --- a/misc/Makefile
> +++ b/misc/Makefile
> @@ -23,17 +23,17 @@ all: $(TARGETS)
> ss: $(SSOBJ)
> $(QUIET_LINK)$(CC) $^ $(LDFLAGS) $(LDLIBS) -o $@
>
> -nstat: nstat.c
> - $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o nstat nstat.c $(LIBNETLINK) -lm
> +nstat: nstat.o
> + $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o nstat nstat.o $(LIBNETLINK) -lm
>
> -ifstat: ifstat.c
> - $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o ifstat ifstat.c $(LIBNETLINK) -lm
> +ifstat: ifstat.o
> + $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o ifstat ifstat.o $(LIBNETLINK) -lm
>
> -rtacct: rtacct.c
> - $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o rtacct rtacct.c $(LIBNETLINK) -lm
> +rtacct: rtacct.o
> + $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o rtacct rtacct.o $(LIBNETLINK) -lm
>
> -arpd: arpd.c
> - $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -I$(DBM_INCLUDE) $(LDFLAGS) -o arpd arpd.c $(LIBNETLINK) -ldb -lpthread
> +arpd: arpd.o
> + $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o arpd arpd.o $(LIBNETLINK) -ldb -lpthread
>
> ssfilter.c: ssfilter.y
> $(QUIET_YACC)bison ssfilter.y -o ssfilter.c
Some CFLAGS do need to be passed to gcc when doing linking, think of -flto
I don't see this on gcc with Debian and hardening.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists