netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] samples/bpf: Fix inline asm issues building samples on arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170807.112840.395506747161262549.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     joelaf@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fengc@...gle.com,
        alison@...-devel.com, Juri.Lelli@....com, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] samples/bpf: Fix inline asm issues building
 samples on arm64

Please, no.

The amount of hellish hacks we are adding to deal with this is getting
way out of control.

BPF programs MUST have their own set of asm headers, this is the
only way to get around this issue in the long term.

I am also strongly against adding -static to the build.