netdev - Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170806.204744.1934067595236180060.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sun, 06 Aug 2017 20:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     dingtianhong@...wei.com
Cc:     leedom@...lsio.com, ashok.raj@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        helgaas@...nel.org, werner@...lsio.com, ganeshgr@...lsio.com,
        asit.k.mallick@...el.com, patrick.j.cramer@...el.com,
        Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com, Bob.Shaw@....com,
        l.stach@...gutronix.de, amira@...lanox.com,
        gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com, David.Laight@...lab.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, mark.rutland@....com, robin.murphy@....com,
        alexander.duyck@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:15:09 +0800

> Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed
> Ordering Attribute set.  This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag,
> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch some known
> devices with Relaxed Ordering issues, and a use of this new flag by the
> cxgb4 driver to avoid using Relaxed Ordering with problematic Root Complex
> Ports.
> 
> It's been years since I've submitted kernel.org patches, I appolgise for the
> almost certain submission errors.

Which tree should merge this?  The PCI tree or my networking tree?