netdev - Re: [PATCHv2] bpf: fix selftest/bpf/test_pkt_md

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:39:00 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, ast@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:     heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] bpf: fix selftest/bpf/test_pkt_md_access on s390x

On 08/07/2017 10:16 AM, Thomas Richter wrote:
> Commit 18f3d6be6be1 ("selftests/bpf: Add test cases to test narrower ctx field loads")
> introduced new eBPF test cases. One of them (test_pkt_md_access.c)
> fails on s390x. The BPF verifier error message is:
>
> [root@...60046 bpf]# ./test_progs
> test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 349 nsec
> test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 212 nsec
> [....]
> libbpf: load bpf program failed: Permission denied
> libbpf: -- BEGIN DUMP LOG ---
> libbpf:
> 0: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0)
> invalid bpf_context access off=0 size=1
>
> libbpf: -- END LOG --
> libbpf: failed to load program 'test1'
> libbpf: failed to load object './test_pkt_md_access.o'
> Summary: 29 PASSED, 1 FAILED
> [root@...60046 bpf]#
>
> This is caused by a byte endianness issue. S390x is a big endian
> architecture.  Pointer access to the lowest byte or halfword of a
> four byte value need to add an offset.
> On little endian architectures this offset is not needed.
>
> Fix this and use the same approach as the originator used for other files
> (for example test_verifier.c) in his original commit.
>
> With this fix the test program test_progs succeeds on s390x:
> [root@...60046 bpf]# ./test_progs
> test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 236 nsec
> test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 217 nsec
> test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 3624 nsec
> test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1722 nsec
> test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 926 nsec
> test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 1322 nsec
> test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-fd-by-notexist-prog-id 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-fd-by-notexist-map-id 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(fd) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-info(fd) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(fd) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-info(fd) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check total prog id found by get_next_id 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check get-map-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check get-map-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec
> test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check total map id found by get_next_id 0 nsec
> test_pkt_md_access:PASS: 277 nsec
> Summary: 30 PASSED, 0 FAILED
> [root@...60046 bpf]#

Fixes: 18f3d6be6be1 ("selftests/bpf: Add test cases to test narrower ctx field loads")

> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

(Patch is for -net tree.)

Thanks Thomas!