[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170809.094223.2075150457804233636.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 09:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fw@...len.de
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] rtnetlink: allow to run selected handlers
without rtnl
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:19:28 +0200
> Would you accept a v2 if i don't touch ipv6 routes for the time being?
>
> I would then audit those again. At the very least inet6_rtm_getroute should
> be able to work without rtnl lock (i.e., use a different lock if
> needed to protect vs. concurrent modifications).
Generally speaking 'get' operations should be fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists