[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170810112939.GA20558@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:29:39 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] rtnetlink: allow selected handlers to
run without rtnl
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> On 8/9/17 6:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > Ok series applied, let's see where this goes :-)
> >
>
> 1 hour in, 1 problem reported
Its even worse. Would you rather see a revert?
I'm sure that you are aware that the widespread rtnl usage is a
problem because it does hurt scalability. I still think its worth trying
to disentangle this where possible.
I should have fixes for the reported fallout soon.
Alternatively, I can send a revert plus patch to add ASSERT_RTNL in
one more spot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists