[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877eybs7ps.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:33:51 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: Allow name change of IFF_UP interfaces
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
>>
>> >> We are - rtnetlink_event() does the job. We, however, don't have a
>> >> special IFLA_EVENT_* for name change and end up with IFLA_EVENT_NONE.
>> >
>> > What is in this event? Old and new name? Just the new name?
>>
>> Basically, it's everything we know about the interface - type, index,
>> name, mtu, qdisc, ... - see rtnl_fill_ifinfo(). Back to your question -
>> it's only the new name.
>
> So the program needs to keep track of ifindex to know which interface
> has changed name. Doable.
>
Yes, and I'd expect that's what these daemons do nowdays to track name
changes for down interfaces (if/when they care).
> I still expect this has the potential to break something. You probably
> should be asking on linux-api for the API experts opinion.
>
Good idea, I'll do RFCv2 submission.
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists