[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170810004612.22163-3-sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 17:46:04 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com
Cc: devel@...uxdriverproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 02/10] netvsc: don't signal host twice if empty
When hv_pkt_iter_next() returns NULL, it has already called
hv_pkt_iter_close(). Calling it twice can lead to extra host signal.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
---
drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
index 208f03aa83de..c842265d1df9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
@@ -1190,10 +1190,6 @@ int netvsc_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
nvchan->desc = hv_pkt_iter_next(channel, nvchan->desc);
}
- /* if ring is empty, signal host */
- if (!nvchan->desc)
- hv_pkt_iter_close(channel);
-
/* If send of pending receive completions suceeded
* and did not exhaust NAPI budget this time
* and not doing busy poll
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists