netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2 master] bpf: unbreak libelf linkage for bpf obj loader

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:41:31 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 master] bpf: unbreak libelf linkage for bpf obj
 loader

On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:44:13 +0200
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:

> On 08/10/2017 02:35 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:15:41 +0200
> > Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> >  
> >> Commit 69fed534a533 ("change how Config is used in Makefile's") moved
> >> HAVE_MNL specific CFLAGS/LDLIBS for building with libmnl out of the
> >> top level Makefile into sub-Makefiles. However, it also removed the
> >> HAVE_ELF specific CFLAGS/LDLIBS entirely, which breaks the BPF object
> >> loader for tc and ip with "No ELF library support compiled in." despite
> >> having libelf detected in configure script. Fix it similarly as in
> >> 69fed534a533 for HAVE_ELF.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 69fed534a533 ("change how Config is used in Makefile's")
> >> Reported-by: Jeffrey Panneman <jeffrey.panneman@....nl>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>  
> >
> > Thanks, but I am thinking maybe a better solution long term would be to
> > move all the package specific stuff into the generated Config file.
> >
> > That way only the generation shell script would have to change.
> >
> > Also, all the flags should probably be using pkg-config to get the values.  
> 
> Sure, sounds all good, for the time being, I would like to have
> that breakage undone though, so users can work with loading BPF
> programs again on -master.
> 
> Thanks,
> Daniel

Agree. I will merge this for master, and work on better config management
in net-next.