netdev - Re: [net-next 03/12] e1000e: add check on e1e

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1502423664.5735.8.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:54:24 -0700
From:   Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
        davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
        jogreene@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 03/12] e1000e: add check on e1e_wphy() return value

On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 19:53 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 21:47 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> > 
> > I'm a little confused. Is this patch causing any trouble?
> 
> Not to me.  I no longer have an e1000e.
> 
> Given the commit message, this just seemed to be a patch
> that _might_ cause an issue if this code patch is actually
> untested.
> 
> Compilation wise, it's obviously fine.

Fortunately, I have all patches submitted to me thoroughly tested.  It
was a good catch, and we confirmed it does provide a valid fix.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)