[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170812120510.28750-13-phil@nwl.cc>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:04:31 +0200
From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [iproute PATCH 12/51] iproute_lwtunnel: csum_mode value checking was ineffective
ila_csum_name2mode() returning -1 on error but being declared as
returning __u8 doesn't make much sense. Change the code to correctly
detect this issue. Checking for __u8 overruns shouldn't be necessary
though since ila_csum_name2mode() return values are well-defined.
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
---
ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c b/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c
index 5c0c7d110d23e..398ab5e077ed8 100644
--- a/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c
+++ b/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static char *ila_csum_mode2name(__u8 csum_mode)
}
}
-static __u8 ila_csum_name2mode(char *name)
+static int ila_csum_name2mode(char *name)
{
if (strcmp(name, "adj-transport") == 0)
return ILA_CSUM_ADJUST_TRANSPORT;
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static int parse_encap_ila(struct rtattr *rta, size_t len,
while (argc > 0) {
if (strcmp(*argv, "csum-mode") == 0) {
- __u8 csum_mode;
+ int csum_mode;
NEXT_ARG();
@@ -526,7 +526,8 @@ static int parse_encap_ila(struct rtattr *rta, size_t len,
invarg("\"csum-mode\" value is invalid\n",
*argv);
- rta_addattr8(rta, 1024, ILA_ATTR_CSUM_MODE, csum_mode);
+ rta_addattr8(rta, 1024, ILA_ATTR_CSUM_MODE,
+ (__u8)csum_mode);
argc--; argv++;
} else {
--
2.13.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists