netdev - Re: [iproute PATCH 00/51] Fix potential issues detected by Coverity tool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170815160432.GF16375@orbyte.nwl.cc>
Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:04:32 +0200
From:   Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH 00/51] Fix potential issues detected by Coverity
 tool

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:07:25AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:04:19 +0200
> Phil Sutter <phil@....cc> wrote:
> 
> > Covscan really wasn't amused (indicated by the number of patches in this
> > series). Try to make it happy.
> > 
> > Phil Sutter (51):
[...]
> >  40 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> I am not amused by large patchsets either.
> It takes more time to review, and one comment means the whole series
> has to be redone.

OK, so should I send each patch individually (unless related to others)?

Thanks, Phil