netdev - Re: [iproute PATCH 00/51] Fix potential issues detected by Coverity tool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170815091443.44367669@xeon-e3>
Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:14:43 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH 00/51] Fix potential issues detected by Coverity
 tool

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:04:32 +0200
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:07:25AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:04:19 +0200
> > Phil Sutter <phil@....cc> wrote:
> >   
> > > Covscan really wasn't amused (indicated by the number of patches in this
> > > series). Try to make it happy.
> > > 
> > > Phil Sutter (51):  
> [...]
> > >  40 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-)
> > >   
> > 
> > I am not amused by large patchsets either.
> > It takes more time to review, and one comment means the whole series
> > has to be redone.  
> 
> OK, so should I send each patch individually (unless related to others)?
> 
> Thanks, Phil


Group like patches as needed. For example, all the ss patches.