netdev - Re: [PATCH net] datagram: When peeking datagrams with offset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:17:17 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     Matthew Dawson <matthew@...systems.ca>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Macieira, Thiago" <thiago.macieira@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] datagram: When peeking datagrams with offset < 0
 don't skip empty skbs

On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 12:45 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> > For the record, I thought something like the following (uncomplete,
> > does not even compile):
> > ---
> > diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h
> > index 8b13db5163cc..5085cf003b88 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/socket.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/socket.h
> > @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ struct ucred {
> >  #define MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST 0x20000 /* sendpage() internal : not the last page */
> >  #define MSG_BATCH      0x40000 /* sendmmsg(): more messages coming */
> >  #define MSG_EOF         MSG_FIN
> > +#define MSG_PEEK_OFF   0x80000
> 
> Yes, that also works well.
> 
> I'm afraid about exhausting the MSG_* flag space here for a
> feature that is not exposed to userspace. We don't have many flags
> left. We could shadow an existing flag that is unused in this context.

That was my concern, too. Fortunately there are a bunch of flags
defined but apparently unused (MSG_FIN, MSG_SYN, MSG_RST) since long
time (if I'm not too low on coffee).

We can shadow one of them (and ev. drop the above define, if really
unused).

I think that the MSG_PEEK_OFF should be explicitly cleared in
sk_peek_offset() when the 'sk_peek_off' is negative, to avoid beeing
fooled by stray bits into the 'flags' argument.

I'll try to scatch-up something tomorrow.

Thanks,

Paolo