[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1502798357.4936.63.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 04:59:17 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ilya Lesokhin <ilyal@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, davejwatson@...com,
aviadye@...lanox.com, Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] ipv6: Prevent unexpected sk->sk_prot
changes
On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 14:08 +0300, Ilya Lesokhin wrote:
> With this patch IPV6 code ensure that only sockets with the
> expected sk->sk_prot are converted to IPV4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
> index 02d795f..318cd344 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ static int do_ipv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> if (val == PF_INET) {
> struct ipv6_txoptions *opt;
> struct sk_buff *pktopt;
> + struct proto *expected_prot;
>
> if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_RAW)
> break;
> @@ -199,6 +200,17 @@ static int do_ipv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> break;
> }
>
> + if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP &&
> + sk->sk_prot != &tcpv6_prot)
> + break;
> +
> + expected_prot = &udpv6_prot;
> + if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_UDPLITE)
> + expected_prot = &udplitev6_prot;
> +
> + if (sk->sk_prot != expected_prot)
> + break;
> +
> fl6_free_socklist(sk);
> __ipv6_sock_mc_close(sk);
>
I am afraid I do not understand this patch at all.
Direct references to tcpv6_prot, udpv6_prot, and udplitev6_prot in
net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c looks completely broken.
Please provide something cleaner, maybe by adding a new method
(implementation would then be provided in TCP / UDP code )
Powered by blists - more mailing lists