[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170815.170517.2085855853566792385.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jiri@...nulli.us
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
dsahern@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] ipv6: fib: Provide offload indication using
nexthop flags
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:09:49 +0200
> From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
>
> IPv6 routes currently lack nexthop flags as in IPv4. This has several
> implications.
>
> In the forwarding path, it requires us to check the carrier state of the
> nexthop device and potentially ignore a linkdown route, instead of
> checking for RTNH_F_LINKDOWN.
>
> It also requires capable drivers to use the user facing IPv6-specific
> route flags to provide offload indication, instead of using the nexthop
> flags as in IPv4.
>
> Add nexthop flags to IPv6 routes in the 40 bytes hole and use it to
> provide offload indication instead of the RTF_OFFLOAD flag, which is
> removed while it's still not part of any official kernel release.
>
> In the near future we would like to use the field for the
> RTNH_F_{LINKDOWN,DEAD} flags, but this change is more involved and might
> not be ready in time for the current cycle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists