[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD0056B94@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:08:40 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'David Miller' <davem@...emloft.net>,
"subashab@...eaurora.org" <subashab@...eaurora.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"fengguang.wu@...el.com" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"dcbw@...hat.com" <dcbw@...hat.com>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 3/3 v4] drivers: net: ethernet: qualcomm:
rmnet: Initial implementation
From: David Miller
> Sent: 16 August 2017 05:24
> From: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>
> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:15:53 -0600
>
> > +static int rmnet_unregister_real_device(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + int config_id = RMNET_LOCAL_LOGICAL_ENDPOINT;
> > + struct rmnet_logical_ep_conf_s *epconfig_l;
> > + struct rmnet_phys_ep_conf_s *config;
> > +
> > + ASSERT_RTNL();
> > +
> > + netdev_info(dev, "Removing device %s\n", dev->name);
> > +
> > + if (!rmnet_is_real_dev_registered(dev))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + for (; config_id < RMNET_MAX_LOGICAL_EP; config_id++) {
>
> This loop is so much harder to understand because you initialize
> the loop index several lines above the for() statement. Just
> initialize it here at the beginning of the for() loop and deal
> with the fact that this will have to therefore be a multi-line
> for() statement the best you can.
...
One way to split the multi-line for() is to put the initialiser
on the immediately preceding line:
config_id = RMNET_LOCAL_LOGICAL_ENDPOINT;
for (; config_id < RMNET_MAX_LOGICAL_EP; config_id++) {
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists