netdev - Re: [patch net-next 1/3] idr: Use unsigned long instead of int

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170816214410.GA13430@avx2>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:44:10 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:     Chris Mi <chrism@...lanox.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 1/3] idr: Use unsigned long instead of int

	[CC trimmed]

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:12:16PM -0400, Chris Mi wrote:
> IDR uses internally radix tree which uses unsigned long. It doesn't
> makes sense to have index as signed value.

It doesn't. But it makes sense to use "unsigned int" because it
generates smaller code on x86_64.